吃瓜不打烊

Skip to main content

The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news.

Subscribe Follow Us
  • Trump 2.0

    Trump 2.0

    • Agency Watch
    • State Watch
    • Rural Health Payout
  • Public Health

    Public Health

    • Vaccines
    • CDC & Disease
    • Environmental Health
    All Public Health
  • Audio Reports

    Audio Reports

    • What the Health?
    • Healthcare Helpline
    • 吃瓜不打烊 Minute
    • An Arm and a Leg
    • Health Hub
    • HealthQ
    • Silence in Sikeston
    • Epidemic
    All Audio
  • Special Reports

    Special Reports

    • Bill Of The Month
    • Common Ground
    • Diagnosis: Debt
    • The Body Shops
    • Priced Out
    • Guns, Race, and Profit
    • Broken Rehab
    • Dead Zone
    • Denied
    • Opioid Settlement Tracking
    • Eleven Minutes
    All Special Reports
  • More Topics

    More Topics

    • Elections
    • Healthcare Costs
    • Insurance
    • Prescription Drugs
    • Health Industry
    • Immigration
    • Reproductive Health
    • Technology
    • Rural Health
    • Race and Health
    • Aging
    • Mental Health
    • Affordable Care Act
    • Medicare
    • Medicaid
    • Children’s Health
    All Topics

  • Medicare Advantage Billing Probe
  • School Vaccine Mandates
  • Weight Loss Drugs Coverage
  • Opioid Settlement Money
  • Abortion Pill Access

Morning Briefing

Summaries of health policy coverage from major news organizations

  • Email

Wednesday, Jun 14 2017

Full Issue

PBMs, The Middlemen Of Pharma, Aren't Completely To Blame For High Drug Prices

News outlets report on stories related to pharmaceutical pricing.

Over the past several months, drug makers have been particularly vocal in blaming pharmacy benefit managers 鈥斅爐he middlemen who negotiate favorable insurance coverage for medicines 鈥斅爁or rising prices. PBMs and insurers, in turn, blame drug makers. The truth lies somewhere in between, according to Linda Cahn, a consultant who advises health plans and employers on PBM contract negotiations. However, she does fault PBMs for a lack of transparency and certain contracting practices. So we asked her to briefly explain some of these issues. This is an edited version. (Silverman, 6/13)

The ads have been popping up on billboards, buses and subways and in glossy magazines, with portraits of attractive men and women and a simple question in bold letters: What is Vivitrol? Five years ago, Vivitrol was a treatment for opioid addiction that was struggling to find a market. Now, its sales and profile are rising fast, thanks to its manufacturers鈥 shrewd use of political connections, and despite scant science to prove the drug鈥檚 efficacy. (Goodnough and Zernike, 6/11)

Two years ago, a mental health advocate named Steve McCaffrey stood at a lectern in the Indiana statehouse, testifying in favor of an addiction treatment bill. After years of rising overdose rates, lawmakers in the health committee were taking action to combat the opioid epidemic. And they often turned to McCaffrey, who leads Mental Health America of Indiana, to advise them. His brief testimony appeared straightforward. "We rise in support, urge your adoption," said McCaffrey. He said the legislation would move the state "toward evidence-based treatment." But the bill wouldn't do that. (Harper, 6/12)

U.S. sales of blockbuster prostate-cancer drugs have dropped sharply since the start of a federal investigation into charities that help patients pay for these drugs, as the manufacturers have reduced donations to the charities and instead given away the medicines for free. Drugmakers donate hundreds of millions of dollars a year to charities that help U.S. patients cover out-of-pocket costs for drugs. In turn, the drugmakers rely on the charities to effectively boost the sales of those drugs. The assistance ensures patients fill their prescriptions, and insurance pays the rest of the tab. (Rockoff, 6/11)

Seeking to put a lid on rising drug prices, U.S. Sen. Ron Wyden has introduced a bill that would require drug makers to justify hefty price hikes, a move that resembles legislation being introduced in a growing number of state legislatures around the country. In this instance, the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services would track increases in list prices and notify manufacturers when those prices exceed certain benchmarks. At that point, drug makers would have to justify the increases 鈥 and may also have to provide information on R&D funding and marketing costs 鈥斅爋r they can lower their prices. (Silverman, 6/13)

A Tuesday discussion on drug prices that was supposed to be bipartisan quickly veered to Democrats' criticism of the Republican plan to overhaul the health care system and the lack of hearings held on the issue. It was the first Senate hearing on drug prices held by a committee that can actually legislate on the subject since drug prices became a hot issue in the fall of 2015. At the outset of the Senate Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee hearing, Chairman Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn., stressed that the intent was to 鈥渂etter understand this complex subject and agree on some basic facts.鈥 The hearing, he noted, was convened at the request of committee Democrats and Republicans alike. (Siddons, 6/13)

At least 28 million Americans have experienced a spike in the cost of their prescription medications in the past 12 months. And for 4 million of them, the price was so high they walked away without their prescription altogether, according to a new Consumer Reports survey. 鈥淲e are nearing a crisis point with what Americans can afford for medication, and it's scary," concluded Consumer Reports. "And honestly, as far as we can tell, there are no brakes on it right now. Congress may have a few things up its sleeve, but we're still waiting.鈥 (Velshi, Girvin, Popken and Cappetta, 6/11)

Amgen may face yet another setback with its controversial Repatha cholesterol-lowering drug because an influential nonprofit may soon lower its value rating for the medicine. In a new report, the Institute for Clinical and Economic Review indicated that recently released clinical trial results prompted a reassessment, which will be lower than an initial cost-effective analysis issued two years ago. At the time, ICER pegged the value of the drug at between $5,400 and $7,700, which was notably lower than the $14,000 list price. (Silverman, 6/13)

A corporate dispute over a price-discount program for diabetes patients taking Eli Lilly & Co.鈥檚 insulin has resulted in an industry middleman鈥檚 exit from the deal鈥攖he latest sign of discord among players in a prescription-drug supply chain facing criticism for high prices. Blink Health LLC, a provider of consumer price discounts for prescription drugs, said it has terminated its relationship with Express Scripts ESRX 0.18% Holding Co., a pharmacy-benefit manager that helped arrange the new price break for Lilly鈥檚 insulin. (Loftus, 6/13)

Biotechnology company Biogen Inc. has completed an experiment that shows that quantum computers have the potential to speed up drug discovery for diseases such as multiple sclerosis, Alzheimer鈥檚 and Parkinson鈥檚. The Cambridge, Mass.-based firm, which declined to be interviewed for this story, is the latest company to experiment with cutting-edge technology that harnesses the power of quantum mechanics to solve complex problems in nanoseconds. Experts say that within five yearsquantum computing will be powerful enough to solve problems that are currently beyond the scope of today鈥檚 most advanced computers. (Castellanos, 6/13)

A group of prominent cancer doctors is planning a novel assault on high drug costs, using clinical trials to show that many oncology medications could be taken at lower doses or for shorter periods without hurting their effectiveness. As Exhibit A, they point to their pilot study involving a widely prescribed drug for advanced prostate cancer. Cutting the standard dose of Zytiga by three-quarters was as effective as taking the full amount 鈥 as long as聽patients swallowed the medication with a low-fat breakfast rather than on an empty stomach, as directed by the label. (McGinley, 6/8)

A French pharmaceutical company developing a Zika vaccine funded with millions of dollars in research grants from American taxpayers has rejected a request from the U.S. Army to set an affordable price for the drug once it becomes available. Sanofi Pasteur has already received $43 million in research grants from the Department of Health and Human Services, and the U.S. Army intends to award an exclusive contract to the company to license and sell a vaccine based on technology discovered with American taxpayer funds. (Chang, 6/12)

In a study of 10 high-income countries with universal health care, costs for prescription drugs in 6 of the largest categories of primary care medicines varied by more than 600%, according to research published in CMAJ (Canadian Medical Association Journal). (6/12)

This is part of the Morning Briefing, a summary of health policy coverage from major news organizations. Sign up for an email subscription.
Newsletter icon

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

Stay informed by signing up for the Morning Briefing and other emails:

Recent Morning Briefings

  • Monday, August 3
  • Friday, July 31
  • Thursday, July 30
  • Wednesday, July 29
  • Tuesday, July 28
  • Monday, July 27
More Morning Briefings
RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
  • Special Reports
  • Morning Briefing
  • 吃瓜不打烊
  • Republish Our Content
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

  • RSS

Sign up for emails

Join our email list for regular updates based on your personal preferences.

Sign up
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy

漏 2026 KFF