吃瓜不打烊

Skip to main content

The independent source for health policy research, polling, and news.

Subscribe Follow Us
  • Trump 2.0

    Trump 2.0

    • Agency Watch
    • State Watch
    • Rural Health Payout
  • Public Health

    Public Health

    • Vaccines
    • CDC & Disease
    • Environmental Health
    All Public Health
  • Audio Reports

    Audio Reports

    • What the Health?
    • Healthcare Helpline
    • 吃瓜不打烊 Minute
    • An Arm and a Leg
    • Health Hub
    • HealthQ
    • Silence in Sikeston
    • Epidemic
    All Audio
  • Special Reports

    Special Reports

    • Bill Of The Month
    • Common Ground
    • Diagnosis: Debt
    • The Body Shops
    • Priced Out
    • Guns, Race, and Profit
    • Broken Rehab
    • Dead Zone
    • Denied
    • Opioid Settlement Tracking
    • Eleven Minutes
    All Special Reports
  • More Topics

    More Topics

    • Elections
    • Healthcare Costs
    • Insurance
    • Prescription Drugs
    • Health Industry
    • Immigration
    • Reproductive Health
    • Technology
    • Rural Health
    • Race and Health
    • Aging
    • Mental Health
    • Affordable Care Act
    • Medicare
    • Medicaid
    • Children’s Health
    All Topics

  • Medicare Advantage Billing Probe
  • School Vaccine Mandates
  • Weight Loss Drugs Coverage
  • Opioid Settlement Money
  • Abortion Pill Access

Morning Briefing

Summaries of health policy coverage from major news organizations

  • Email

Friday, Jun 19 2015

Full Issue

Insurers' Growing Market Hinged To High Court's King V. Burwell Decision

But the Supreme Court ruling will also have a personal impact on those living in states that chose not to establish online insurance marketplaces and who have used insurance subsidies to purchase coverage through healthcare.gov.

The nation鈥檚 health insurers, including leading companies like Aetna, are hoping the Supreme Court does not strike down a provision of the Affordable Care Act that has brought them millions of new policyholders and provided new growth opportunities for the industry. (Radelat, 6/19)

The future of same-sex marriage and President Obama's health care law hang in the balance as the Supreme Court's 2014 term draws rapidly to a close this month. But those aren't the only big issues on the justices' plate. Fair elections, racial discrimination, clean air, capital punishment: All await rulings over the next two weeks as the court completes action on 11 cases remaining this term. The next decisions will come Monday morning. (Wolf, 6/18)

The Supreme Court is expected to rule on health care subsidies soon. As the country awaits the decision, PBS NewsHour interviewed people who would be personally affected by the ruling, and Julie Rovner of KHN answers their concerns. You can watch it here. (6/18)

What the court decides will also shape President Barack Obama's legacy -

Obamacare is a wildcard, as well. The president could win outright in a legacy-clinching decision by the Supreme Court or be dealt a stinging loss. But even if the court votes to remove a vital piece of the 2010 health care law, Obama still could have room to maneuver. Republicans are scrambling to come up with an alternative if millions of Americans suddenly lose their government-backed health insurance. The burden may fall on Republican governors to find a way out of the mess. (6/19)

Meanwhile, on Capitol Hill, the talk among Republicans about what happens after the decision continues -

Speaker John Boehner (R-Ohio) is pushing back against the idea of Republicans simply continuing ObamaCare subsidies if the Supreme Court cripples the law. At a press conference Thursday, Boehner was asked why a House GOP plan included repeal of the individual mandate, which would just be 鈥渧eto-bait鈥 for President Obama, and why Republicans would not just extend subsidies through the presidential election while looking for concessions elsewhere in exchange. (Sullivan, 6/18)

One of the House鈥檚 most conservative lawmakers wants to prevent Congress from rescuing ObamaCare insurance subsidies if the Supreme Court strikes them down this month. Rep. Paul Gosar (R-Ariz.) rolled out a bill Thursday that would repeal most parts of ObamaCare if the court rules against the government in King v. Burwell. Unlike recently unveiled plans from House leadership, Gosar鈥檚 plan does not include any extension of the subsidies. That approach was immediately praised by Heritage Action, which has strongly opposed the continuation of the subsidies because they said it will 鈥渟imply cover up the law鈥檚 costs while giving the impression Republicans believe subsidies are necessary for Americans to afford health insurance.鈥 (Ferris, 6/18)

This is part of the Morning Briefing, a summary of health policy coverage from major news organizations. Sign up for an email subscription.
Newsletter icon

Sign Up For Our Newsletter

Stay informed by signing up for the Morning Briefing and other emails:

Recent Morning Briefings

  • Today, July 31
  • Thursday, July 30
  • Wednesday, July 29
  • Tuesday, July 28
  • Monday, July 27
  • Friday, July 24
More Morning Briefings
RSS Feeds
  • Podcasts
  • Special Reports
  • Morning Briefing
  • 吃瓜不打烊
  • Republish Our Content
  • Contact Us

Follow Us

  • RSS

Sign up for emails

Join our email list for regular updates based on your personal preferences.

Sign up
  • Editorial Policy
  • Privacy Policy

漏 2026 KFF