Morning Briefing
Summaries of health policy coverage from major news organizations
Defining A Person's Sex At Birth And Making It Unchangeable Would Be 'An Insult To Science,' Biologists Say
Anatomy at birth may prompt a check in the "male" or "female" box on the birth certificate 鈥 but to doctors and scientists, sex and gender aren't always the same thing. The Trump administration purportedly is considering defining gender as determined by sex organs at birth, which if adopted could deny certain civil rights protections to an estimated 1.4 million transgender Americans. (Neergaard, 10/23)
A new report that the Trump administration hopes to legally define a person鈥檚 sex at birth 鈥 an unchangeable condition determined by genitalia 鈥 has prompted an outcry among the transgender community. But beyond the political implications 鈥 and fears that any such change could ultimately mean the end of civil rights protections for transgender people 鈥 the proposal raises fundamental questions about something else: biology. The proposal is 鈥渉ighly inaccurate and just an insult to science. Basic science,鈥 said Rachel Levin, a Pomona College neuroscientist who studies the development of sex. (Thielking, 10/22)
Researchers who have studied gender issues and provided health care to people who do not fit the typical M/F pigeonholes said that the Trump administration鈥檚 latest plan to define gender goes beyond the limits of scientific knowledge. 鈥淭he idea that a person鈥檚 sex is determined by their anatomy at birth is not true, and we鈥檝e known that it鈥檚 not true for decades,鈥 said Dr. Joshua D. Safer, an endocrinologist and executive director of the Center for Transgender Medicine and Surgery at Mount Sinai Health System in New York. He is also president of the United States Professional Association of Transgender Health. (Grady, 10/22)