Morning Briefing
Summaries of health policy coverage from major news organizations
CRISPR鈥檚 International Patchwork Of Patents
Last week, a federal appeals court ruled that foundational CRISPR-Cas9 patents awarded to the Broad Institute described a significantly different invention than does a patent application (in limbo since 2012) from the University of California. As a result, the Broad鈥檚 patents do not 鈥渋nterfere鈥 with the one UC applied for. That allowed the Broad to keep its valuable intellectual property and left UC鈥檚 CRISPR hanging by a thread. The chances that UC can persuade the full appeals court to re-hear its case for interference, let alone get the Supreme Court to, are next to nil. If not that, what comes next? (Begley, 9/17)